Audit My Application

See how it works

Illustrative example created for Prompt Atlas using fictional data; no real opportunities or deadlines verified.

Fictional application: CV documents two years of experience, but cover letter claims five. The call requires three years, a CV and a signed cover letter. Uploaded files include a CV and an unsigned letter. The letter says 'best coordinator in the region' without evidence and lists no examples of the required reporting skill.

Illustrative audit findings:
• Eligibility: the documented two years do not satisfy the stated three-year requirement. Check whether an official exception exists; do not assume eligibility.
• Contradiction: the letter claims five years, while the CV supports two. Correct the letter to the truthful duration and reconcile the dates.
• Missing requirement: the cover letter is unsigned. Add the required signature before submission.
• Unsupported claim: remove ‘best coordinator in the region’ unless reliable evidence supports it. Replace it with a relevant, verifiable achievement.
• Selection-criteria gap: reporting experience is not demonstrated. Add a genuine example and supporting detail, if available.
• Formatting: not assessed because actual files were not supplied. Check page limits, headings, file type and naming against the official instructions.

Essential fixes:
□ Resolve the experience shortfall before proceeding.
□ Correct contradictory experience claims.
□ Sign the cover letter.
□ Remove unsupported superlatives.
□ Add genuine evidence for reporting skills.
□ Check the final files against all submission rules.